header-01-mais.jpg

header-lab-02.jpg

europa    seventh

Scientific information used in GMO risk assessment often is difficult to access for external experts as well as for stakeholders. This was and still is particularly true for whole-food toxicity studies conducted in the course of GM food/feed risk assessment and also applies to scientific literature. The lack of detailed information available has impaired the discussions, inspired speculations and effectively hampered progress in the scientific debate.

 

G-TwYST will therefore make accessible the detailed scientific information including raw data via the open access database CADIMA set up by the FP7 project GRACE. The Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection in Germany supports the maintenance of this open access database that enables the integration of data from all feeding studies conducted troughout G-TwYST, GRACE and GMO90+ beyond the lifetime of the Project.

Latest news

Go to news >

G-TwYST Interim Report available

15 February 2017

 

The G-TwSYT team completed a publicly available Interim report with information about the progress that has been made in the first 1.5 years of the project. The report can be downloaded here.

Value and pitfalls of stakeholderconsultation

17 January 2017

 

In 2013 the Dutch Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM) published a topic report on alarming studies on the safety of GMOs. COGEM pointed out that while repetition of ‘alarming studies’ is sometimes the only way to reject or confirm the results, stakeholder participation during investigation may increase its social robustness.

In a letter sent to the Secretary of State of Infrastucture and Environment on January 11, 2017 COGEM adds some reflections on the value and possible pitfalls of stakeholder participation based on experiences in and results of the GRACE project.

The COGEM letter states that the involvement of stakeholders in this project has been meticulous and transparent and has finally contributed to the validity of the results also from a broader social perspective. However, COGEM also noticed that some stakeholders were too fixated on their own arguments and vision, that reflection and interaction became difficult. According to COGEM this situation significantly hampered the achievement of broadly supported conclusions. On the basis of this experience COGEM also proposed some guidelines for improving such processes.

 

Read the full letter >

Scientific quality criteria (2)

28 November 2016

 

So far, we have received comments on the proposed scientific quality criteria from the Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Germany (BVL) on October 5th, 2016. The comments can be downloaded here.

 

The G-TwYST research team responded to the BVL comments on November 28th, 2016. The response can be downloaded here.