europa    seventh

In the context of the ongoing debate on the risk assessment of GM food/feed in Europe, it is crucial to put the findings of the 2-year feeding study in a perspective that covers:

  1. The scientific quality of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity testing in rats to whole foods/feeds.
  2. The scientific value of long-term feeding trials for GM food/feed risk assessment.


The evaluation of the scientific value will be conducted in a carefully designed and transparent step-by-step approach.


Criteria to evaluate the scientific quality of 2-year feeding trials will be developed and applied prior to the actual feeding trials. The scientific value will mainly be evaluated by clarifying what toxicity relevant information from risk assessment would trigger a long-term feeding study. In both cases G-TwYST will draw on the experience and standards in other toxicity assessment contexts.

Evaluation of the scientific quality of long-term GM food/feed feeding trials

In order to identify criteria to evaluate the scientific quality of long-term feeding studies, guidance documents for aspects of toxicity assessment relevant to the scope of the WP have been identified and analyzed. The criteria cover all aspects of the feeding trials.

Based on these documents a draft set of suitable criteria has been established by the project team and will be applied to the feeding trials being performed by the G-TwYST project and by the GRACE project as well as to the feeding trials having been performed by other research groups/consortia in the past.
The criteria as well as the experience and insights gained from their application for GM food/feed testing have been discussed in a mini-workshop to which external experts were invited. Subsequently, the draft list of criteria has been revised according to the recommendations resulting from the workshop and a final set of quality criteria has been published at the reports pages of the project website.


Justification of long-term feeding trials for GM food/feed risk assessment

In order to define the triggers that would justify performing a chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity feeding trial, the scientific literature and guidance documents on 90-day feeding trials from a broad range of toxicity assessment contexts will be searched and collected from publicly accessible databases (scientific literature, research projects, data collections, and bibliographies) and further accessible sources such as the GRACE central access database.
Previously applied or suggested trigger items will be subjected to a review by the project team and candidate trigger items will be identified. In a subsequent step the usefulness of the candidate triggers will be evaluated by analyzing the data obtained by the Project with GM maize NK603 and GM maize MON8 10 in 90-day, the 12-month feeding trials, and the preliminary results of the 2-year feeding trials as well as the results of feeding trials having been performed by other research groups/consortia in the past, thereby allowing to determine the added value of long-term feeding trials for GM food/feed risk assessment.
The candidate trigger items and the experience in applying them in practice will be discussed and recommendations will be compiled in a second mini-workshop, to which external experts will be invited (M26, month 43). Based on the results of this workshop a report characterizing the proposed trigger items and describing the underlying rationale will be prepared and published at the project website.

Latest news

Go to news >

G-TwYST Interim Report available

15 February 2017


The G-TwSYT team completed a publicly available Interim report with information about the progress that has been made in the first 1.5 years of the project. The report can be downloaded here.

Value and pitfalls of stakeholderconsultation

17 January 2017


In 2013 the Dutch Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM) published a topic report on alarming studies on the safety of GMOs. COGEM pointed out that while repetition of ‘alarming studies’ is sometimes the only way to reject or confirm the results, stakeholder participation during investigation may increase its social robustness.

In a letter sent to the Secretary of State of Infrastucture and Environment on January 11, 2017 COGEM adds some reflections on the value and possible pitfalls of stakeholder participation based on experiences in and results of the GRACE project.

The COGEM letter states that the involvement of stakeholders in this project has been meticulous and transparent and has finally contributed to the validity of the results also from a broader social perspective. However, COGEM also noticed that some stakeholders were too fixated on their own arguments and vision, that reflection and interaction became difficult. According to COGEM this situation significantly hampered the achievement of broadly supported conclusions. On the basis of this experience COGEM also proposed some guidelines for improving such processes.


Read the full letter >

Scientific quality criteria (2)

28 November 2016


So far, we have received comments on the proposed scientific quality criteria from the Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Germany (BVL) on October 5th, 2016. The comments can be downloaded here.


The G-TwYST research team responded to the BVL comments on November 28th, 2016. The response can be downloaded here.